Documents from health officials, scientists, and scholars against vaccine mandates

  1. Open letter to B.C. Premier and Health ministers, from health professionals
  2. “The Silence of the Professors” (on issues they should be addressing)
  3. Statement by Canadian ethics professor, Julie Ponesse, who refused experimental vaccine on the grounds of freedom of medical choice, informed consent, and bodily autonomy.
  4. A call for medical freedom of choice against mandates in universities
  5. A Letter to Public Health Officers (from 12 Canadian scholars)
  6. Letter from 57 doctors, urging an end to ‘vaccines’
  7. Article: “A crisis has now darkened Western democracies just as surely as long-benighted dictatorships. Wherein
    does it lie? In the disdain with which its proud technocrats dismiss conscience.”
  8. Statistics Canada report: four times as many people under 65 years old died from ‘lockdown deaths’ as from Covid-19. A lockdown death is from suicide, overdose, or lack of access to medical care.
  9. An article on how the Prime Minister (Trudeau) is demonizing and scapegoating Canadians unjustly and why that’s wrong
  10. Why so many vaccinated people are getting sick? Why are they still promoting the ‘vaccine’ if it’s causing the 4th wave?

    And a shorter version of the same, on ADE
  11. Dr. Robert Malone on ADE
  12. Why was the lockdown model ever followed at all? The costs outweigh the benefits:

    Could it be that it had political value for authoritarians, far more than any public health benefit, and the health care industry submitted for fear of losing their jobs? That’s plausible because many who did speak out this draconian measure lost their jobs.
  13. Photos of nurses protesting —they object to vaccine mandates. Not all health professionals are in agreement with what’s happening now – we just don’t hear about them in the media. Why is that? The media in Canada is paid by the government to promote its position.


How can it be right to destroy people’s livelihoods and violate their inalienable rights for a disease with a 94 to 99% recovery rate, and then force people to take an experimental drug or lose their jobs and services? That’s discrimination.

How can it be right to compel healthy university students who have a 99.99% recovery rate to take the jab and put them at risk of adverse events?

How is it right to violate human rights and create a segregated society in which one group of it is scapegoated by imposing vaccine passports and mandates?

How is right to suppress low-cost treatments that work in favour of expensive, experimental drugs that don’t provide immunity – drugs that give Big Pharma huge profits and state actors absolute power over us?

How is it right to coerce another person to take a drug again their will?

Do Canadians really want a society in which the following are the norm?

• Censorship (no freedom of speech, no academic freedom)
• Suspension of inalienable rights
• Statism and state media with only one approved message
• Scapegoating portions of the population
(i.e., the unvaccinated, those who protest the state)
• Giving state-sanctioned ‘health’ apparatchiks absolute
authority over our lives
• Creating lockdown deaths and ruining small
businesses and countless lives in the process


We will never emerge from this as long as people continue to submit to it. Be like the people in Australia who recently went back to the beach in an act o massive civil disobedience. Giving in to the authoritarians is a slippery slope to more and more losses of freedom until nothing is left and we might as well be living in a Communist country. If we accept the loss of bodily autonomy, where does it end?

Published by


"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity ... the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This immaturity is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the [European] Enlightenment. "Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet [or vaccine], and so on--then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind ... should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. "Thus it is very difficult for the individual to work himself out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown to like it, and is at first really incapable of using his own understanding because he has never been permitted to try it. Dogmas and formulas [e.g., Leftist ideology, identity politics] these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use--or rather abuse--of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting immaturity. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from immaturity by cultivating their own minds." - Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s