Trudeau’s Internet Censorship Agenda Violates Constitutional Rights: Legal Experts

Constitutional Rights via the internet. Charter Rights via Covid. A common theme emerges in an erosion of democracy in Canada: Cap for Canada

by Brad Salzberg, CAP for Canada, Oct. 2021

The Liberal government’s proposed online harms legislation would violate Canadians’ constitutional and privacy rights, warn internet law experts.

Cultural Action Party has a succinct response: so what? As if a breach of constitutional or legal rights will impede PM Justin Trudeau from censoring the internet in Canada. His prototype is in place. It’s called the Great Internet Firewall of China.

Deng Xiaoping,  who served as leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from 1978 to 1989, was known for issuing the following statement:

“If you open the window, both fresh air and flies will be blown in.” His words are  considered to be the political and ideological basis of China’s Great Internet Firewall.

Canadian internet legal expert Michael Geist says This suggests requiring Internet providers to install blocking capabilities, creating content adjudicators to issue blocking orders, dispensing with net neutrality, and building a Canadian Internet firewall.”

Bingo– CAP theory validated. Our Liberal government is incrementally pushing society toward a reasonable facsimile of life in China.

The University of Ottawa’s CIPPIC said the government should set the fundamentally flawed proposal aside, and anything less “will jeopardize Canada’s claim to being a leader in advancing free expression, a free and open internet, and the human rights upon which our democratic society has been built.”

These academic “experts” neglect a basic truism: Justin Trudeau and the Liberals want to decimate freedom of expression. To erode civil rights upon which our democracy is built is a high priority goal.

When cutting through the rhetoric surrounding internet censorship, we arrive at several lucid ideas. Our government want to shut up everybody who stand in opposition to Liberal government ideology. The list includes the following:

— Citizens who give journalists a hard time regarding their globalist propaganda dissemination.

— In-the-shadows multicultural non-profit groups complaining about racism and bigotry.

— Political figures who don’t want citizens to contact them with vitriolic messaging.

— Myopic and ethnocentric academic “experts.” 

The bottom line is social division. A separation of the post-modern elite from the rabble of society. The creation of an untouchable class, as found within authoritarian nations.

An establishment of a bona fide ruling class– separate and apart from hordes of unenlightened meathead citizens.  Ringing any bells? If not, try the former Soviet Union— another communist society admired by the Trudeau family.

The online harms bill would target online posts in five categories — terrorist content, content that incites violence, hate speech, intimate images shared non-consensually, and child sexual exploitation content.

How many times will society be subject to scheming bait and switch legislation tactics? Everybody wants child exploitation to end. Meanwhile, the greatest erasure of freedom of speech in Canadian history lies in the shadows.

So typical, so successful. Another technique drawn from communist theory– political subterfuge. Watch and witness as the prime minister voted in with weakest statistical victory ever maintains the greatest control over society in history.

Yet another sign of the breakdown of democracy. Constitutional Rights via Internet Censorship. Charter Rights via Covid. Anyone else notice a common theme for an erosion of democratic governance? As found in communist countries, where media work for government.

How fascinating– the fewer Canadians that vote, the longer the Team Trudeau remain in office. Will the day come when no one voting at all results in the Liberal government ruling in perpetuity?

— Brad Salzberg, CAP Founder(Est. 2016)


All graphics added by Think for Yourself

Parody of censorship of so-called “medical misinformation” which is actually valued scientific information, but censored because it challenged Big Pharm vaccine profits:

Example of censorship by Twitter:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is twitter-censorship.png

Published by


"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity ... the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This immaturity is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the [European] Enlightenment. "Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet [or vaccine], and so on--then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind ... should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. "Thus it is very difficult for the individual to work himself out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown to like it, and is at first really incapable of using his own understanding because he has never been permitted to try it. Dogmas and formulas [e.g., Leftist ideology, identity politics] these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use--or rather abuse--of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting immaturity. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from immaturity by cultivating their own minds." - Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s