Newfoundland Government —I Decline To Enforce Your Demand Not To Release Your Answer 

I’m sure it irks them to no end that a former Premier is demanding answers and accountability regarding the violation of our most basic rights as Canadians, and is daring to question Canada’s descent into authoritarianism — which goes against everything that this country ever stood for. They’d rather sweep it under the table and for you to disappear (though I daresay some of them secretly admire you for taking a stand when so few others have the courage). Churchill said, “the most valuable thing in the world is the truth; so valuable that it has often been barricaded by a bodyguard of lies.” That’s what’s happening here. I applaud you, Sir, for speaking the truth and for asking our political servants to do the same. They work for us and should be far more transparent than this. For the rest of my days, I will always remember the example you’ve provided: the retired elder statesman who could have rested on his laurels, but instead going up against medical tyranny even as everyone else seemed to fall away in complicity or despair. What you’re doing is important and necessary. Thank you. I hope other Canadians will follow your example and demand answers.


As stated in my blog several days ago, I have received only one answer from the ten provinces concerning my request that they test their pandemic measures to see if they are indeed Constitutional . All Provinces have the mechanism to do this.

The one answer I received is from my native Province , Newfoundland and Labrador where on behalf of the Premier the Attorney General provided a non answer and had attached an order that I was not to release the e-mail answer.

Well I have thought about that.

The answer the AG gave is that he cannot inform me of the answer because it comes under a solicitor/client privilege. That is one Government Department advising another Government Department is covered under solicitor,client privilege.

Now , I have not attempted to even see if there is an validity to this.

All I know is that an elected democratic government…

View original post 262 more words

Published by


"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity ... the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This immaturity is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the [European] Enlightenment. "Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet [or vaccine], and so on--then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind ... should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. "Thus it is very difficult for the individual to work himself out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown to like it, and is at first really incapable of using his own understanding because he has never been permitted to try it. Dogmas and formulas [e.g., Leftist ideology, identity politics] these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use--or rather abuse--of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting immaturity. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from immaturity by cultivating their own minds." - Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s