28 American million children ages 5 to 11 to be sacrificed for Big Pharma profits

[NB – this could also apply to roughly 2.5 million children in Canada in the near future, as well, since Health Canada is reviewing Pfizer’s application to give the drug to 5 to 11-year-olds.

See my past article on this topic here, which goes into detail about the FDA clinical trial which says this age group has an 86% adverse event rate — which should be considered unacceptable]

by Gateway Pundit, Oct. 29, 2021

This week, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel unanimously (with one abstention) approved Pfizer’s COVID vaccine to be given to 5- to 11-year-old children.

In doing so, the FDA betrayed the expanded mission Congress gave it in the early 1960s after the morning sickness drug thalidomide caused thousands of birth defects in newborn infants in over 40 foreign countries (though exactly how thalidomide caused these defects was not fully understood until just a few years ago).

In 1962, because of thalidomide’s devastating impact, Congress added what were known as the “Kefauver Amendments” to the original bill which created the FDA in 1938. In laymen’s terms, the agency’s fundamental focus became (Page 3 at link) “better extremely safe than sorry.” Those amendments’ most critical elements (Page 5 at link) “authorized the FDA to deny a new drug application (NDA) if there was not substantial evidence that the drug would have its claimed effect.”

The FDA panel’s decision completely and indefensibly abandoned the agency’s posture during the past 60 years by approving the use of the vaccine for 28 million children in the 5-11 age group despite the clear lack of legally required “substantial evidence” of safety, or even efficacy.

The current uncertainty surrounding the use of the vaccine on young children is so severe that one panelist, Dr. Eric Ruben, clearly determined to skip the complete set of clinical trials and other steps ordinarily involved in NDAs for vaccines, asserted that “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it goes.”

They’re also apparently not done. In June, a Cleveland TV station reported (as seen in the final seconds of the video at the link, but not in its transcript) that the “next steps” are “looking at 2- to 5-year-olds, and also the 6 months to two-year-olds.” Pfizer’s own “Clinical Trials in Children” page confirms that the company has been conducting trials on children as young as 6 months old.

We are being led down a dangerous path, as Kaylee McGhee White explained at the Washington Examiner on Wednesday. In her article titled “FDA wants to use children as guinea pigs for COVID-19 vaccines,” she wrote:

It’s one thing to expect grown adults capable of making responsible decisions to get the shot; it’s another to ask minors to become test subjects for a vaccine, especially when the virus this vaccine combats is not a threat to children’s health in the first place.

Families who want to get their children vaccinated against COVID-19 should be free to do so. That’s their choice. The problem, however, is that it’s only a matter of time before they lose that choice and vaccination becomes mandatory.

In California, it’s not even a matter of time. Governor Gavin Newsom has already mandated that all schoolchildren get the shot when it becomes available. This mandate ignores the reality that “approximately double … (the number) of children have died of pneumonia” than have died from COVID since the virus appeared in the U.S. early last year. Absent public pushback, Newsom’s move will surely be followed by similar measures in other blue states governed by control freaks.

In an October 23 letter to the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganó, former Apostolic Nuncio to the USA, wrote:

How Joe Biden, who also defines himself as “Catholic,” could impose vaccination on 28 million children aged 5 to 11, is absolutely inconceivable, if only for the fact that there is practically zero risk of them developing the SARS-CoV-2 disease. The Holy See and the Bishops’ Conferences have the duty to express a firm condemnation in this regard, and also in relation to the very serious side effects that can result for children who are inoculated with the experimental gene serum.

When will Catholics, people of other faiths, and other Americans from all walks of life wake up, see what’s happening in plain sight, and scream, “STOP!”? Time is running short.


Above: children’s book illustration by Pfizer to condition childern to accept being human guinea pigs for their clinical trials

Below: page from FDA clinical trial showing adverse events for taking Pfizer jab

Published by

Ungekrzte

"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity ... the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This immaturity is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the [European] Enlightenment. "Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet [or vaccine], and so on--then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind ... should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. "Thus it is very difficult for the individual to work himself out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown to like it, and is at first really incapable of using his own understanding because he has never been permitted to try it. Dogmas and formulas [e.g., Leftist ideology, identity politics] these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use--or rather abuse--of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting immaturity. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from immaturity by cultivating their own minds." - Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s