21 Essential Studies that Raise Grave Doubts about COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates

peckford42

BYPAUL ELIAS ALEXANDERNOVEMBER 10, 2021POLICY,PUBLIC HEALTH9 MINUTE READSHARE | PRINT | EMAILFacebookTwitterRedditLinkedInFlipboardTelegramPrintEmailShare

The following research papers and studies raise doubts that Covid vaccine mandates are backed by science and good public-health practice. Anyone seeking to challenge these mandates should consult these carefully. They demonstrate that these mandates provide no overall health benefit to the community and can even be harmful. Instead, the decision to accept the vaccine should be made by individuals according to their own assessment of risks in consultation with informed medical professionals.

The model ofMarek’s disease(‘leaky’ non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not stop infection or transmission) and the concept of theOriginal antigenic sin(the initial priming of the immune system prejudices the immune response to the pathogen or similar pathogen life-long) may explain what we are…

View original post 1,980 more words

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s