Conflict Of Interest: Documents Prove Bill Gates Gave $319 Million To Top Mainstream Media Outlets

[NB – This is an important revelation regarding mainstream media bias viz. Covid-19 reporting. In addition to Gates and other globalists in the Good Club, the MSM were paid off by the Communist Party of China, Big Pharma, and other corporate and political actors invested in the transition to a more authoritarian global regime. The whole truth of this must come out. The media is not telling the truth or giving us the real news. Journalists today are little more than political propagandists, spreading extremely dangerous lies and working to censor and defame anyone who dares to tell the truth. Do not trust anything you read or see on CNN, NPR, NYT, WaPo, etc in the U.S or CBC, CTV, etc in Canada.]

MSM - What does MSM stand for?

The World We Live In

According to MintPress News, theBill & Melinda Gates Foundationdonated at least $319 million to fund media projects at hundreds of organizations including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic, raising questions about those news outlets’ ability to report objectively on Gates and his work.

byAlan Macleod

conflict of interest bill gates gave $319 million to major media outlets

Up until his recent messy divorce,Bill Gatesenjoyed something of a free pass in corporate media. Generally presented as a kindly nerd who wants to save the world, theMicrosoftco-founder was even unironically christened “Saint Bill” by The Guardian.

While otherbillionaires’ media empiresare relatively well known, the extent to which Gates’s cash underwrites the modern media landscape is not. After sorting through over 30,000 individual grants, MintPress can reveal that theBill & Melinda Gates Foundation(BMGF) has made over $300 million worth of donations to fund media projects.

Recipients of this cash include many…

View original post 2,974 more words

Published by

Ungekrzte

"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity ... the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This immaturity is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the [European] Enlightenment. "Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large part of mankind gladly remain minors all their lives, long after nature has freed them from external guidance. They are the reasons why it is so easy for others to set themselves up as guardians. It is so comfortable to be a minor. If I have a book that thinks for me, a pastor who acts as my conscience, a physician who prescribes my diet [or vaccine], and so on--then I have no need to exert myself. I have no need to think, if only I can pay; others will take care of that disagreeable business for me. Those guardians who have kindly taken supervision upon themselves see to it that the overwhelming majority of mankind ... should consider the step to maturity, not only as hard, but as extremely dangerous. First, these guardians make their domestic cattle stupid and carefully prevent the docile creatures from taking a single step without the leading-strings to which they have fastened them. Then they show them the danger that would threaten them if they should try to walk by themselves. Now this danger is really not very great; after stumbling a few times they would, at last, learn to walk. However, examples of such failures intimidate and generally discourage all further attempts. "Thus it is very difficult for the individual to work himself out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown to like it, and is at first really incapable of using his own understanding because he has never been permitted to try it. Dogmas and formulas [e.g., Leftist ideology, identity politics] these mechanical tools designed for reasonable use--or rather abuse--of his natural gifts, are the fetters of an everlasting immaturity. The man who casts them off would make an uncertain leap over the narrowest ditch, because he is not used to such free movement. That is why there are only a few men who walk firmly, and who have emerged from immaturity by cultivating their own minds." - Kant, "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s