I subscribe to numerous sources of Covid-19 news sources and every day have a full inbox of such posts to peruse, re-post, or analyze as the case may be. Much of it is of the variety that the MSM likes to condemn as “misinformation” – but in my opinion is a better reflection of the truth than the lies the MSM peddles. I trust my own capacity for rational judgment more than that of corrupt media editors. I don’t want them to choose for me what to read. That is my choice, not theirs.
All of which is a lead-up to my analysis of a story titled “Whistleblower Nurse Reveals Medical Tracking Code Used to Find Anti-China Virus Vaxxers.” While I have in the past, on this blog, warned of the use of ID chips to track us, and on the use of bar codes on human beings in China, I was at first a bit skeptical of this story — though as I reveal below, there’s a kernel of truth in it.
First of all, there are Internation Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes used in hospitals by staff in the U.S. to categorize the patient’s medical status and history (see a more detailed explanation below), mostly for billing purposes. They’re not meant to replace diagnosis.
The whistleblower in question says that “an ICD 10 code is your diagnosis code. It flags your insurance, it flags anytime anybody goes looking through codes, CMS, Medicare. They type in a code, and anybody who’s been diagnosed with that code comes up on a list.”
The code in question is “2022 ICD-10-CM CODE Z28.20” and gives the message “Immunization not carried out because of patient decision for an unspecified reason.” This is in the U.S. but every country must have something equivalent, based on international codes designated by the WHO.
“This code might also be used to specify conditions or terms like booster meningitis c vaccination declined, did not attend 2nd DTP, Hib and polio vaccination” etc. In other words, it covers all vaccinations. It would seem they’ve not yet arrived at a code just for the mRNA injections for Covid-19.
However, smartphones can be used for contact tracing using vax passports, so a code to designate the unvaccinated is not far off. This is one reason I don’t use smartphones anymore.
But if the government mandates mRNA shots for all citizens, and then ID chips (such as that developed by ID2020) become the norm for use in all transactions, Orwell’s 1984 would truly have arrived. Many are also drawing the obvious comparison to Revelation 13, which I’ve previously written.
Fact-checkers and isolation camps
I don’t trust ‘fact-checkers’ but found this information helpful for clarification: according to the Reuter’s ‘fact-checking’ site, the CDC “says here that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandates all providers covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) use a set of codes for electronic health care transactions starting Oct. 1, 2015. This set of codes is defined as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), authorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) (here). The codes began as mortality and death certificate classifications in the United States in 1999 and since then, a variation of the codes has been used for medical diagnoses and inpatient procedures, the CDC says (here).”
Fair enough. Thus far the ‘fact-checker’ is actually reporting facts, not opinions. But then they later err at the end of the article when they write: “Reuters has previously debunked claims that unvaccinated people will be placed in camps here , here and here . VERDICT: Missing context. There is no evidence that a classification code will be used to place unvaccinated people into education camps.” They are trying to correct the whistleblower’s conclusion that the ICD codes could be used to arrest people and put them in isolation camps.
Reuters and other ‘fact-checkers’ have in the past erred by arguing that the unvaccinated will not be placed in isolation camps. It’s already happening in several places in the world. For example, 38 people were placed in one, by the military, in Australia, and here I post testimony and footage of such a place. The camps have been built all around the world, including the U.S. and Canada, as I have previously reported and provided photo proof of.
The isolation camps (aka quarantine centres) are billed as voluntary, but in reality, people can be arrested and taken to them — presumably if there’s a court order for their arrest. Authorities are taking it slow right now, but are prepping for a big push right, including fabricated Covid case counts, to manufacture another crisis to justify more draconian measures. Whenever they want to increase the pressure they do more PCR tests, a certain percentage of which they know will be false positives.
This time the political campaign (still posing as public health intervention) is directed against the unvaccinated, even though they/we don’t pose any more risk of infection or transmission than the vaccinated, and even though the Omicron variant is essentially harmless. Yet they’re treating it like it’s the Bubonic plague, including border closings: “Omicron Forces Wave of Closures Nationwide as White House Warns ‘Winter of Death’ Coming.” First of all, far more people have died of mRNA shots in the U.S. than Omicron. The U.S. ratio is 150,000 mRNA deaths to just one Omicron-related death (as of four days ago).
But I digress. Getting back to Reuter’s claim that there’s no evidence the diagnostic code will be used to place people in isolation camps, they’re technically correct. There’s no direct evidence suggesting that the state will do this right now, but there is evidence that one’s vaccination status is increasingly being used to restrict basic freedoms we all took for granted two years ago, even though there’s no valid medical reason for doing so and a growing body of scientific evidence pointing to the conclusion that the government’s response is erroneous and discriminatory.
Isolation camps have been built and in some places, people are being forced into them, so it’s not much of a leap to suggest that could happen, or even predict that it will happen in the U.S. and Canada. ‘So-called ‘fact-checkers’ appear to be trying to dispel that notion is just a case of doing damage control. As I have written before, the ‘fact-checkers’ are paid to gaslight us into accepting medical tyranny.
I don’t think hospital diagnostic codes will be the tool they use to accomplish that, however. But I do believe the (anonymous) nurse was right to blow the whistle on an email she allegedly received from her superiors regarding this code: [ICD 10 Code:] Z28.20, which designates “immunization not carried out because of the patient’s decision for an unspecified reason.” The email says, “This new code will allow us to follow vaccine counseling visits & take more steps to vaccinate.” Apparently, the addition of 21 at the end (Z28.21) means “patient refusal.”
These diagnostic codes are nothing new. They cover all sorts of medical conditions and their use seems prudent for hospitals dealing with tens of thousands of patients on a regular basis. But it would seem that staff in some hospitals are now being put in the position of pushing an experimental drug with numerous negative side effects — on top of being forced to take the drug through vax mandates.
It’s also the first I’ve heard of regarding a digital code to designate an unvaccinated state. Yes, we have so-called vaccine passports that designate vaccinated status, but the powers that be have yet to implement a universal digital ID chip designating unvaccinated status. If and when they do — and I believe they will, in time — that will mark a cornerstone in the rise of real medical fascism. They’re taking it in stages, to condition us to accept this loss of basic rights as ‘the new normal.’
Austria has mandated mNRA injections for all citizens by February 2022. Who knows what one more year of this collective madness will bring? There have recently been some hopeful developments on this front, but the outcome of this war on humanity is still very far from certain. Medical tyrants have gone a long way in a short time: from “two weeks to flatten the curve” two years ago, to mandatory injections and dispensing with all constitutional and human rights. So why I don’t want to think the worst, I would be imprudent not to. And anyone who actually still believes this about public health must be in willful denial or complicit with evil out of self-interest or fear.
So I would disagree with Reuters’ conclusion on this matter. Yes, there is some context missing, but they’re wrong to argue that isolation camps are not being used to punish the unvaccinated. I think we should be worried that technocratic means are being used to medically segregate us and violate basic human rights and that medical staffers are being dragooned into acting as enforcers of this new world order.
Another takeaway: if hospital staff force medications on people against their will, they will be violating medical ethics and crossing over a line they shouldn’t cross. Hospital staff have a right to say no to doing this, and patients have a right to refuse as well.
More about the diagnostic codes. Their structure is:
- – Immunization – See Also: Vaccination;
- Z codes represent reasons for encounters. A corresponding procedure code must accompany a Z code if a procedure is performed. Categories Z00-Z99 are provided for occasions when circumstances other than a disease, injury or external cause classifiable to categories A00-Y89 are recorded as ‘diagnoses’ or ‘problems’. This can arise in two main ways:
- (a) When a person who may or may not be sick encounters the health services for some specific purpose, such as to receive limited care or service for a current condition, to donate an organ or tissue, to receive prophylactic vaccination (immunization), or to discuss a problem which is in itself not a disease or injury.
- (b) When some circumstance or problem is present which influences the person’s health status but is not in itself a current illness or injury. Source