by Milosz Matuschek, Jan 10, 2022 [translated, edited]
Are the vaccines free of side effects and harmless? Or are we in the midst of the world’s biggest health scandal in history?
On January 11th, 2021, Gunnar Michel, a long-time employee of the German Red Cross in the German town of Eschwege, posted on Facebook: “I’ve been vaccinated for 14400 seconds now!” On February 2nd, 2021, Michel posted that another 28800 seconds have passed since the second vaccination and that he is still alive and has no significant side effects except for a slight pain at the injection site.
He also wrote [on Facebook]: “Don’t listen to ‘Quardenkers’ [the Quardenker (literally ‘lateral thinker’) is a populist German movement against Covid vaccine mandates and for human freedom, sometimes wrongly identified as ‘far-right’]
Miche continues: “Just get vaccinated when you get the offer! Any other option [i.e., not taking the jab] is certainly not compatible with life! And for sure I can say that during my assignment as part of a vaccination team [for the Red Cross] everyone we met wanted to be vaccinated! This is contrary to what the Quardenkers allege. They drum loudly, but whoever drums loudly not necessarily correct.”
[NB – I went to Michel’s Facebook site, which is still up, and many of his posts are enthusiastically pro-vaccination]
Gunnar Michel doesn’t post anything anymore. Gunnar Michel has been dead since October 11th, 2021. The Red Cross team of the DRK Eschwege mourns the death of the comrade, who “was suddenly and unexpectedly torn from life far too early at the age of 52”. He thus joins the ranks of the conspicuously frequent cases of vaccinated people, which circulate through the Internet and through obituaries, and raise the question that no one officially asks: ‘Was the Covid vaccination the real cause of death?’
Even in this case, we’ll never know because these cases are not usually autopsied. The fact that the Covid vaccine can be the cause of death is only shown by private autopsies on a small scale, as carried out by the pathologist Arne Burkhardt (see a story on his work: https://principia-scientific.com/pathologists-shocking-finding-from-deaths-after-covid-19-jabs/). Such cases are immediately censored on the Internet and labeled as dubious without further justification.
[NB – There really is no way to know in this case. A middle-aged man is prone to heart attack, so that could have been it too; but the point is that a lot of people are dying from the mRNA injections, as the VAERS data seems to suggest; it could be as much as 150,000 in the U.S. It could be a million or more worldwide. It’s hard to be certain since data on this is not collected, but there is now a famous insurance report indicating a 40% increase in deaths in the U.S.]
We are in an exceptional social [and political] situation. Politicians, the media, and a part of the scientific community are still vehemently campaigning for vaccinations against Covid-19, and compulsory [mandatory] vaccination for all is still under discussion. [It has been famously put into law in Austria, for example, to start Feb. 1st, 2022]
Just as vehemently, a minority warns of harmful and even fatal side effects of the Covid vaccines. The average citizen is thus faced with the situation of having to decide who to believe.
This question of life and death has led to diametrically opposed positions. Officially, the jab is offered to the average citizen as the only proper solution. Unofficially, it’s part of the problem. But anyone who expresses even a bit of doubt can expect to be defamed as ‘anti-vaxxer’ or a Covid denier, [or conspiracy theorist].
Knowledge is a debt to collect
Knowledge is a debt; you have to actively acquire it. So let’s turn the tables and ask ourselves: have the many vaccine advocates actually engaged with the evidence that speaks for reasonable doubts about the possible risks and side effects of the vaccines? Why doesn’t arouse suspicion that in 2021, the year of mass vaccinations against Covid-19, mortality is higher than in 2020, the year of the beginning of the pandemic?
Why do you only read about vaccine opponents who died of Covid but never about those who died in close proximity to the vaccinations? Isn’t this supposed to be about protecting our health?
Numerous midwives also report an increased number of abortions in late weeks of pregnancy in vaccinated pregnant women. The fact that there is a numerical correlation between vaccinations and increased death tolls has been statistically demonstrated by researchers months ago on the basis of official figures produced in Europe and Israel.
Where is the personal responsibility of vaccine manufacturers, pro-vaccination doctors, politicians, scientists, and journalists who, at least to a limited extent, deliberately advertise or use experimental drugs that have been hastily placed on the market?
The German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach spoke publicly of a “side-effect-free vaccination” and also resorted to the syringe himself.
Milos Matuschek: “In the summer, @Karl_Lauterbach tweeted that the vaccinations are “side effect-free.” 1/5 [1 of 5 tweets]
Karl Lauterbach. “Agreed” [Lauterbach is agreeing with Rahmstorf’s point below, and adding to them, as is common on Twitter] He continues: “And in addition, there’s the question raised by a minority of society that doesn’t want anything but a side-effect-free vaccination, even though the [mRNA] vaccine is free and can save their lives and that of others. That is why I am pessimistic about voluntary sacrifices for climate protection.”
[NB – Lauterbach’s point seems to be that he doesn’t believe some people will voluntarily abstain from excess consumption that causes climate change, just as they won’t voluntarily take a drug that he alleges will save lives, just because it’s not free of negative side-effects. He is implying that the unvaccinated are selfish and to take the jab is selfless. And he is also admitting here, implicitly, that the mRNA injections do have potential negative side-effects, even though in the past — as Matuschek points out — Lauterbach (falsely) claimed they didn’t – though as Health Minister and being a physician he must surely have known they did]
Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf: “Could it be that the election campaign is focusing on the alternatives of “saving Currywurst” or “saving the world”? [NB – ‘currywurst’ is a German fast food made of meat, which has greenhouse gas emissions associated with it, much as steaks or hamburgers do in the U.S. in popular political discourse, so Rahmstorf’s point is something about not voluntarily eating meat to save the climate]
[There are further tweets from Matuschek, in reply to Lauterbach, not in his article but I am posting them here, for posterity:
In FDA documents, Biontech/Pfizer lists nine (!) pages of side effects on, pp. 30ff
[The document is worth looking at: it lists literally hundreds of potential side-effects (adverse events) from pp. 30-38]
The FDA documents says:
“1p36 deletion syndrome; 2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria; 5’nucleotidase increased; acoustic neuritis; Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency; Acquired epidermolysis bullosa; Acquired epileptic aphasia; Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures; Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis; Acute flaccid myelitis; Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis; Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy; Acute kidney injury; etc. [it goes on for 8 pages of other side-effects … this is just the start of the As]
“Whether this health minister is clueless or deliberately malicious, I don’t know. All I know is that he should resign!”]
[In the article, Matuschek says the same thing]
Confidential documents from Pfizer/Biontech, which are available to the American regulatory authority, list the known side effects [listed above].
Are we ruled by unsuspecting or even deliberately evil politicians? In either case, Mr Lauterbach should resign immediately.
The evidence is abundantly clear
According to the manufacturer, the nano-lipids (ALC-0159 and ALC-0315), the carrier for mRNA, used in the Biontech vaccine “BNT162b2” (Comirnaty) are only to be used for research purposes (“for research use only”).